Dominique Strauss Kahn sexual assault: How conspiracy theorists assume his alleged victim is guilty. - By Johan Hufnagel and Cecile Dehesdin - Slate Magazine
This is my blog. I speak for no one but myself here. The words I write, the images I post, and the articles I link to interest no one but me. I stand by what I put here, however, it is not a reflection of time, effort, or particular care. I just want a clearinghouse of what does interest me and a space to spout out poorly written and thoughtout rants. Consider this a disclaimer.
Thursday, May 19, 2011
A View from France
While Paille and Boutin talk of "vigor" and "weakness," the NYPD has described a violent sexual assault, during which DSK allegedly forced the woman to perform oral sex on him and tried to remove her clothes against her will. Paillé and Boutin focus on the fact that DSK may have been taken in, neglecting what he may have done to the maid at the Sofitel. The potential crime, as they see it, is all about DSK's weakness rather than his strength and the maid's weakness. Yes, we must respect that DSK is innocent until proven guilty. But to consider the case simply as a conspiracy theory or an "ambush" on a "libertine" is to transform the presumption of innocence into a presumption of guilt on the part of the accusers.
Dominique Strauss Kahn sexual assault: How conspiracy theorists assume his alleged victim is guilty. - By Johan Hufnagel and Cecile Dehesdin - Slate Magazine
Dominique Strauss Kahn sexual assault: How conspiracy theorists assume his alleged victim is guilty. - By Johan Hufnagel and Cecile Dehesdin - Slate Magazine
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be nice. Sign your name.